- Kari Norman
Senior Economist
Economic Viewpoint
The Devil’s in the Development Charges
How “Growth Pays for Growth” Is Shaping Housing
Supply and Affordability
June 18, 2026
- Development charges (DCs)—municipal fees levied on new construction to help fund growth-related infrastructure such as roads, transit and water systems—have increased much more rapidly than underlying costs. In part, this divergence reflects policy design rather than infrastructure requirements. Across Ontario municipalities, DCs have risen by roughly 500% over two decades—far outpacing underlying drivers such as construction costs, wages and inflation.
- High and rising DCs are constraining housing supply and putting upward pressure on prices. Substantial upfront charges can render some proposed projects unviable, discourage higher-density development and are largely passed on to homebuyers.
- The current model concentrates costs on new buyers and creates financing inefficiencies. DCs are embedded in home prices and therefore financed through mortgages, which typically have amortization periods of about 25 years. However, DC-funded infrastructure projects typically have much longer service lives and are eligible for lower-cost public financing.
- Alternative financing models for growth-related infrastructure exist but involve trade-offs. Options such as municipal or other government borrowing, utility-style financing and greater reliance on transfers can shift costs over time and across users but may increase debt, user fees or property taxes.