Choose your settings

Choose your language
Economic Viewpoint

West Coast Oil Pipeline: Is the Next Barrel Worth the Price?

August 26, 2026
Laura Gu, Senior Economist • Marc-Antoine Dumont, Senior Economist

Highlights

  • The proposed West Coast Oil Pipeline (WCOP) would move 1 million barrels per day (b/d) of Alberta heavy crude to a marine terminal in southern British Columbia, increasing oil exports to Asian markets and reducing Canada’s dependence on the US market. Oil demand is expected to keep growing in Asia, but demand for Canadian barrels specifically remains uncertain.
  • WCOP could be a net positive, but only if costs are contained. Alberta’s current pipeline cost estimate of $35B to $44B is still early-stage and excludes financing costs. Canada’s recent infrastructure record—especially the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX)—shows how delays, permitting complexity and financing during construction risk undermining the economics of an otherwise strategically valuable project.
  • The new pipeline could reduce bottleneck risk, but any narrowing of the differential between Western Canadian Select (WCS) and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) would likely be temporary. Its main benefit lies in increasing production and exports, which would require a major increase in capital investment, effectively reversing the industry’s current focus on capital discipline and shareholder returns. Canadian producers have the cash to fund production growth, but new pipeline capacity alone will not be enough to trigger a large investment wave.
  • The project could deliver economic benefits, but current estimates of those benefits should be taken with a grain of salt. Economic gains from construction are temporary and sensitive to domestic content, labour availability and input costs, while the benefit from operations is better understood as a higher level of GDP, not a recurring annual growth boost.
  • Government royalties and tax receipts help justify public funding, especially given Alberta’s recurring bitumen royalty upside and Ottawa’s broader tax gains. But cost overruns are also an important consideration in large infrastructure projects. A project structure that aligns risks and returns among governments, producers, shippers, Indigenous partners and external investors helps support long-term viability and broad stakeholder participation.
NOTE TO READERS: The letters k, M and B are used in texts, graphs and tables to refer to thousands, millions and billions respectively. IMPORTANT: This document is based on public information and may under no circumstances be used or construed as a commitment by Desjardins Group. While the information provided has been determined on the basis of data obtained from sources that are deemed to be reliable, Desjardins Group in no way warrants that the information is accurate or complete. The document is provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation for purchase or sale. Desjardins Group takes no responsibility for the consequences of any decision whatsoever made on the basis of the data contained herein and does not hereby undertake to provide any advice, notably in the area of investment services. Data on prices and margins is provided for information purposes and may be modified at any time based on such factors as market conditions. The past performances and projections expressed herein are no guarantee of future performance. Unless otherwise indicated, the opinions and forecasts contained herein are those of the document’s authors and do not represent the opinions of any other person or the official position of Desjardins Group.